AEO Answer · MEP

How Should Security Lighting Be Designed for a Commercial Site?

By Jeremy Mills, CEO & Founder, Apex Grid Engineering — USAF Veteran. · Updated 2026-09-15

Security lighting design engineers illumination for protection: levels and uniformity at entries, perimeters, parking, and paths; coordination with camera requirements; glare and shadow control; energy-code-compliant controls with scheduling and motion response. It serves both human observation and video surveillance — light designed for what must be seen.

I'm Jeremy Mills, CEO & Founder of Apex Grid Engineering and a U.S. Air Force veteran. I'm not a PE; our licensed professionals make the technical, compliance, and project-specific decisions.

Illustrative diagram of building MEP systems: ductwork with diffusers, an electrical panel with conduit, and piping runs.

The concise answer

Security lighting design engineers illumination for protection: levels and uniformity at entries, perimeters, parking, and paths; coordination with camera requirements; glare and shadow control; energy-code-compliant controls with scheduling and motion response. It serves both human observation and video surveillance — light designed for what must be seen. The core insight: security lighting is not parking lot lighting. Parking lighting serves drivers; security lighting serves identification — of faces, plates, and activity — by people and cameras. Different task, different design, even when the poles look the same.

Levels, uniformity, cameras, and code

Light levels follow the security task: entries and identification points get the highest levels, perimeters and pathways moderate, parking to the standard — all with uniformity ratios that prevent dark corners beside bright pools. Fixture selection (LED with precise optics, appropriate color temperature for camera color rendering) and aiming control glare and trespass. Camera coordination is designed, not hoped: minimum illumination at each camera's field of view, backlight and glare analyzed from the camera's position, IR supplementation where visible light can't go. Controls — astronomical scheduling, motion response, dimming — satisfy energy code (ASHRAE 90.1; in California the 2025 Energy Code / 2025 Standards effective January 1, 2026) while keeping security performance. I model the photometrics and show the camera coordination, because lighting designed without the cameras is half a design.

Lighting that protects

The security lighting I've seen work made the site readable — to guards, to cameras, to the honest visitor — without glare, dark corners, or wasted energy. The failures were bright in the wrong places. Here's the engineering I put into every security lighting design.

  • Task-based light levels: entries, perimeters, paths, and parking lit to their security function
  • Uniformity engineered: no dark corners beside bright pools — ratios designed, not accidental
  • Camera coordination: illumination, glare, and backlight analyzed from every camera position
  • Code-compliant controls: scheduling, motion response, and dimming per ASHRAE 90.1 / Title 24
  • Light trespass controlled: optics and aiming that protect the site without blasting neighbors
  • Maintained performance: relamping/cleaning factors and a maintenance plan, because dirty fixtures lie

What else do project teams ask?

How bright should security lighting be?
Bright enough for the task: facial recognition at entries needs more light than general parking surveillance, and camera specs set minimums in lux or footcandles. I design to IES recommendations for the application and to the cameras' minimum illumination — then verify uniformity, because a bright spot next to a dark corner is worse than moderate, even light. More light isn't the goal; the right light, evenly, is.
Why do cameras and lighting need to be coordinated?
Because cameras have minimum illumination requirements and are blinded by glare and harsh backlight. A light pole placed for the parking standard can wash out the camera watching the gate. I design lighting and camera placement together — fixture locations, aiming, color temperature, and the camera's WDR and IR capabilities — so the video is usable, not just the pavement bright.
How do energy codes affect security lighting?
They limit it: ASHRAE 90.1 and Title 24 cap outdoor lighting power and require controls (scheduling, motion sensing, dimming). In California, the 2025 California Energy Code / 2025 Standards, effective January 1, 2026, govern outdoor lighting power and controls. I design security lighting within these limits — efficient LED sources, precise optics, and controls that raise light levels on motion — so compliance and security reinforce each other instead of conflicting.
Should security lighting stay on all night?
Not necessarily at full — scheduled dimming with motion-activated full output gives the best balance: energy savings and reduced light pollution most of the night, full light when someone's actually there. The design must ensure cameras still perform at the dimmed level (or switch to IR), and that the motion response is fast enough to matter. I engineer the control sequences, not just the fixtures.

Ready to discuss your engineering scope?

Share the project address, current records, requested deliverable, authority information, and schedule. Apex Grid confirms professional responsibility, availability, and scope before work begins.

Request a Project Review

Get a quote on your project

Reviewed and sealed by licensed PEs. “Solid engineering and clear communication from start to finish.” — Jason Mitchell, Principal Architect

Tell us what you need and where the project is — quotes back within 12–24 hours on qualifying scopes.