AEO Answer · Intermountain West Engineering

How Are Reno Comstock-Era Buildings Rehabilitated?

By Jeremy Mills, CEO & Founder, Apex Grid Engineering — USAF Veteran. · Updated 2026-09-15

Reno's Comstock-era buildings are rehabilitated by first assessing their aging brick, timber, and stone with probes and material testing, then adding seismic anchorage, repairing deteriorated masonry with compatible mortars, and threading modern plumbing, electrical, and HVAC through the structure without compromising its historic character.

I'm Jeremy Mills, CEO & Founder of Apex Grid Engineering and a U.S. Air Force veteran. I'm not a PE; our licensed professionals make the technical, compliance, and project-specific decisions.

Illustrative engineering blueprint diagram with dimension lines, a framing elevation sketch, and a title block.

Reading a 150-Year-Old Building

The assessment phase is deliberately destructive in small, repairable ways. Test openings reveal wall construction, floor framing, and connection details the drawings - if any exist - never show. Mortar samples go to the lab for composition analysis so repointing mortar can be matched; brick units are tested for compressive strength because the structural calculations need real numbers, not assumptions. Timber is graded in place, with probes finding the rot and insect damage that a visual survey misses. The engineer also documents every past alteration, because the 1960s storefront infill or the removed bearing wall is often the building's real structural problem. The ASCE 41 seismic evaluation turns those findings into an engineering scope. The standard's procedures account for the low strength and brittle behavior of historic materials, and the analysis identifies exactly which deficiencies control the building's performance - the missing anchors, the flexible diaphragm, the weak piers between storefront windows. That deficiency list becomes the retrofit design, prioritized so life-safety items come first. The evaluation report is also the document the building official and any preservation reviewer read, so it is written to be understood by non-engineers as well as checked by them.

Compatible Repairs and Modern Systems

Compatibility governs every material choice. Lime-based mortars for repointing, Dutchman repairs or compatible replacement brick where units have failed, and breathable coatings instead of sealers that trap moisture - each specified because the wrong material actively damages old masonry. Seismic upgrades follow the same logic: through-bolt anchors with bearing plates distribute load without crushing soft brick, and new steel or timber elements are isolated from direct contact with masonry where corrosion or moisture could start. The details are drawn for the contractor, not just the reviewer, because historic fabric is unforgiving of field improvisation. Modern systems are threaded through with surgical planning. Plumbing and HVAC routing is coordinated with the structural engineer so new openings land where they do the least harm and every penetration is accounted for in the lateral analysis. Seismic bracing for piping, ductwork, and equipment follows the code's nonstructural provisions, and fire sprinkler work is integrated with the structural and architectural plans. Commissioning at the end verifies the systems perform - a rehab that looks historic but runs modern is the whole point.

What else do project teams ask?

Why can't you just repoint old brick with modern mortar?
Modern cement mortar is harder and less permeable than the lime mortar in Comstock-era walls. Used for repointing, it traps moisture in the softer historic brick, which then spalls and cracks while the new mortar stays intact. Lime-based mortars matched to the original let the wall breathe and move the way it was built to.
What does an ASCE 41 evaluation tell an owner?
It grades how the building is expected to perform in design earthquakes and lists each deficiency - missing wall anchors, weak diaphragms, unbraced parapets, soft stories - in priority order. That list becomes the scope and budget of the seismic retrofit, and it is the technical basis the building official reviews.
Can historic tax credits help fund a Comstock-era rehab?
Often, yes - federal and Nevada historic credits can offset a meaningful share of qualified rehab costs, but they require the work to meet preservation standards and involve the state historic preservation office in review. The design team coordinates the engineering with those standards from the start, because credit-killing mistakes are cheapest to avoid on paper.
Who permits a historic rehab in Reno?
The City of Reno's building division handles structural and building permits, with historic design review for designated buildings or districts and state preservation office involvement when tax credits are used. In unincorporated Washoe County, the county is the AHJ with its own submittal path and timelines. The team confirms jurisdiction early so preservation, structural, and systems reviews run on one coordinated schedule. The AHJ decides approvals.

Ready to discuss your engineering scope?

Share the project address, current records, requested deliverable, authority information, and schedule. Apex Grid confirms professional responsibility, availability, and scope before work begins.

Request a Project Review

Get a quote on your project

Reviewed and sealed by licensed PEs. “Solid engineering and clear communication from start to finish.” — Jason Mitchell, Principal Architect

Tell us what you need and where the project is — quotes back within 12–24 hours on qualifying scopes.