AEO Answer · Structural
How Do Helical Piers Work to Repair Settling Foundations?
By Jeremy Mills, CEO & Founder, Apex Grid Engineering — USAF Veteran. · Updated 2026-09-15
Helical piers are steel shafts with screw-like plates that are rotated into stable soil or bedrock; foundation brackets then transfer the building's load to the piers, bypassing weak or moving soils.
I'm Jeremy Mills, CEO & Founder of Apex Grid Engineering and a U.S. Air Force veteran. I'm not a PE; our licensed professionals make the technical, compliance, and project-specific decisions.
The concise answer
Helical piers are steel shafts with screw-like plates that are rotated into stable soil or bedrock; foundation brackets then transfer the building's load to the piers, bypassing weak or moving soils. The engineering has three parts. First, the geotechnical picture: what the soil is, where the competent bearing layer is, and what's causing the movement — because piers treat the symptom's cause only if the diagnosis is right. Second, the pier layout and capacity: spacing, shaft size, helix configuration, and the design load per pier, all tied to the torque-to-capacity relationship the installer verifies in the field. Third, the bracket and connection design: how the existing foundation ties to the piers, and the lift sequence if recovery is the goal.
Helical piers versus other underpinning
Piers aren't the only way to stabilize a foundation, and the choice matters. Compared with push piers, helicals install with known torque correlation — you get a real-time read on capacity during installation rather than relying on refusal pressure alone. Compared with concrete underpinning (pits dug and poured beneath the footing), helicals install faster, with far less excavation and mess, and they can achieve lift where mass concrete mostly just stabilizes. Where helicals struggle: very dense soils or cobble where the plates can't advance, and sites where the competent layer is so deep the cost stops making sense. A straight-shaft drilled pier or micropile may win there. The geotechnical report drives this decision — I won't specify a pier type without one on a real settlement job.
What the installation and verification look like
Installation is refreshingly observable compared with most foundation work. Each pier is screwed in with a hydraulic drive head, and the installer logs torque continuously — torque correlates to capacity, so the engineer gets field verification as the work happens rather than hoping the design assumptions held. After installation, the brackets are attached to the foundation, load is transferred, and any planned lift is done incrementally with monitoring. The closeout package I like to see: the torque logs, the bracket and lift records, and a post-installation elevation survey documenting where things ended up. That paperwork is what the next buyer, the next engineer, and the jurisdiction will ask for.
- Torque logs: field proof of capacity, recorded pier by pier during installation
- Bracket connections: the engineered link between old foundation and new pier
- Lift monitoring: incremental jacking with survey control to avoid over-stressing the structure
- Post-install survey: documents final elevations for the project record
- Drainage correction: piers don't fix the water problem that caused settlement — address grading and downspouts too
Which related engineering resources can help?
What else do project teams ask?
What causes foundation settlement that piers can fix?
How deep do helical piers go?
Can helical piers lift a settled foundation back to level?
What should I send for an initial review?
Ready to discuss your engineering scope?
Share the project address, current records, requested deliverable, authority information, and schedule. Apex Grid confirms professional responsibility, availability, and scope before work begins.
Start an Engineering Estimate